<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubris and ideological purity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Jayvie Canono: on WordPress, Politics, Design and Life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20841</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classical Values</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/comment-page-1#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Classical Values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Elected unanimously! The world&#039;s NEWEST GOD!&lt;/strong&gt;
Last night I invented a new god, and now I am finally getting around to writing the post about it. Or, uh, him. I refer to the brand-new god of ideological purity! It is not the purpose of this post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Elected unanimously! The world&#8217;s NEWEST GOD!</strong><br />
Last night I invented a new god, and now I am finally getting around to writing the post about it. Or, uh, him. I refer to the brand-new god of ideological purity! It is not the purpose of this post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Scheie</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/comment-page-1#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Scheie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Loved your remark about ideological purity (one of the most murderous viruses in human history)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved your remark about ideological purity (one of the most murderous viruses in human history)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/comment-page-1#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Guys! &lt;i&gt;Reason&lt;/i&gt; isn&#039;t an Objectivist magazine!
Really. &lt;i&gt;Not one&lt;/i&gt; of the editors is an Objectivist. Sometimes they run stuff that is completely opposed to Objectivist philosophy or politics. (Check out &quot;Self Delusions&quot; in the current issue.) They do run some stuff by Randian writers, but they haven&#039;t treated Rand as a touchstone in maybe 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys! <i>Reason</i> isn&#8217;t an Objectivist magazine!</p>
<p>Really. <i>Not one</i> of the editors is an Objectivist. Sometimes they run stuff that is completely opposed to Objectivist philosophy or politics. (Check out &#8220;Self Delusions&#8221; in the current issue.) They do run some stuff by Randian writers, but they haven&#8217;t treated Rand as a touchstone in maybe 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/comment-page-1#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2003 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2003/12/06/hubris-and-ideological-purity/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Perhaps because he has taken the Catholic religion back a century in social and gender equality measures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps because he has taken the Catholic religion back a century in social and gender equality measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

