<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not for me, mister</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Jayvie Canono: on WordPress, Politics, Design and Life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Galvin Opinion</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/comment-page-1#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>The Galvin Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ALBERT GREENLAND RESPONDS TO ONE FINE JAY&lt;/strong&gt;
Foremost, I want to thank One Fine Jay for an incisive commentary. However, it is my duty to respond to the merits of Jay&#039;s argument. I wish to address what I consider his most salient statements in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ALBERT GREENLAND RESPONDS TO ONE FINE JAY</strong><br />
Foremost, I want to thank One Fine Jay for an incisive commentary. However, it is my duty to respond to the merits of Jay&#8217;s argument. I wish to address what I consider his most salient statements in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Galvin Opinion</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/comment-page-1#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>The Galvin Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BEING &quot;COULTERIAN&quot; MEANS NEVER HAVING TO SAY YOU&#039;R&lt;/strong&gt;
Foremost, I want to thank One Fine Jay for an incisive commentary. However, it is my duty to respond to the merits of Jay&#039;s argument. I wish to address what I consider his most salient statements in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BEING &#8220;COULTERIAN&#8221; MEANS NEVER HAVING TO SAY YOU&#8217;R</strong><br />
Foremost, I want to thank One Fine Jay for an incisive commentary. However, it is my duty to respond to the merits of Jay&#8217;s argument. I wish to address what I consider his most salient statements in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JawsBlog &#187; The nature of Political Discourse</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/comment-page-1#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>JawsBlog &#187; The nature of Political Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; Jaws @ 12:25 pm  	 	 			I meant to point out this post by OF Jay yesterday, on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/&quot;&gt;nature of current political discourse.&lt;/a&gt; 	Jay then has a continuation of the piece here 	I cons [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; Jaws @ 12:25 pm  	 	 			I meant to point out this post by OF Jay yesterday, on the <a href="http://onefinejay.com/2004/08/04/not-for-me-mister/">nature of current political discourse.</a> 	Jay then has a continuation of the piece here 	I cons [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
