Welcome to my life.

I'm a self-avowed WordPress Whisperer with a specialization in front-end design. I live in Maryland. I take lovely photos, go to the gym a lot, and opine strongly over design, aesthetics, and politics. I'm prolific on Twitter; I used to post to Flickr; I have a moblog and in my spare time I help out at the SemperFi WP Support forums. Read more about me.

It would be so wrong…

…for me not to say anything about the debate tonight so here’s my two cents: Global test my mivonks.

Two more cents: it isn’t hypocritical to demand non-proliferation to terrorists and increase our nuke capacity. If you ask me we’re the only country that has the prudence to own nukes. So when Kerry, in one sentence, epitomized the dovish mentality of being ashamed of our own strength, that’s when this debate turned towards Hezmanah for him.

Link sluttage update: Doc J can analyze debates and type in real time quite well.

Prudence

Though the presidential debate is at 9p tonight, there’s yet another debate, one between Michele Catalano and Neal Pollack that’s worth reading, up at Blogcritics. Like most debates between people of fixed minds there is little in the way of a “conclusion” to this discussion, and I don’t mean the flooding in Michele’s office.

The conversation, though impassioned is not bitter,but I’m not surprised to see that both sides are arguing familiar points, that, frankly, make discussions like these seem like the participants are seeing past each other. Right now I think we on either side of this war have run out of ammo to convince each other what we believe to be right. However, there is a war going on, and it is prudent for those who oppose it to tread lightly: Neal Pollack is no traitor. Phillip Shenon, should the allegations raised against him be proven true, is one.

Zoop!

Biggest election-related news of the day: Even if Diplomat Kerry knelt down and did some serious French and German mivonks-sucking, they still will tell him to go to Hezmanah. I expect the Kerry campaign to pile on the dren towards the Bush camp for bruising the country’s respectability in the first place.

Stronger at home, respected in the world? What the yotz does that mean now? “Zoop,” went the campaign platform.

[Here's the Farscape vocab; pardon the bleed-through but I can't wait for Oct. 17. UPDATE: Link to Paul of Wizbang's post added. Oops.]

Penny-pinching, morally bankrupt snots

Jay Nordlinger is done, done and way done (HT: Allah) with fiscal conservatives who, as usual, want the perfect candidate (scroll WAY) down:

[...] I’ll get a million letters saying, “George W. Bush isn’t a conservative! His spending, waaaa, his steel tariffs, waaaa. Gee, it’s not even worth voting in November! Or maybe I’m voting for Kerry, because at least a Republican Congress with a Democratic president . . .”

And so to save money and ensure the purity of their small government conservatism they’d elect to gridlock the nation’s legislative process, screwing the economy, screwing Iraq, and screwing what we did in the war on terror? It reminds me of the “neo-Stalinist goons” that Michael J. Totten wrote about, and how they value purity over results. Or maybe like the contractarian libertarian Randbots that can not, for any reason, justify pre-emption. Or like Andy Sullivan who complains ad nauseam over Bush’s drunk-sailor spending in order to diversify his loathing for the current president on the basis of the current state of his not being able to tie his jollies in a knot with someone else.

Maybe they find the singularity of my rationale for my desired outcome for this election just as hard as to understand as I do the pluarility of their reasons to which they have sold off the judgment between right and wrong. But that’s just me.

A challenge

Volokh Buddy Orin Kerr, after listing grim news, has three questions for the hawkish among us bloggers, regarding the war in Iraq. I accept his offer; his questions are in bold:

First, assuming that you were in favor of the invasion of Iraq at the time of the invasion, do you believe today that the invasion of Iraq was a good idea? Why/why not?

A short series of short questions that require long answers. Initially, in the preparations towards this war, I had a number of concerns that are not unfamiliar. A unified Arab front would campaign against us militarily1, a rise in retaliatory terrorism on our home front as we further anger our enemies into reaction2, and that there was a rush towards mobilization that would make a shoddy military campaign3. Over time, as the campaign actually approached, I shed most of those preconceived concerns and saw that the invasion would actually work, and has continued to work, despite the grim news that we hear every day.

I do believe that the invasion of Iraq is a good idea, on two standpoints: the moral and the tactical.

(Read more…)

GMail anyone?

I have four GMail invites to spare; if you are connected to me through blogging for any reason (linking, commenting, etc) or if I know you via AIM or other medium, and still not have GMail, Gmail me at onefinejay -at- gmail -dot- com with your first and last names and an email address that is not yahoo or hotmail. There is almost no jumping through hoops on this; as long as I know you one way or another.

This post will be updated (and pinged at ping-o-matic, sorry for that) until all the invites are gone. 4…

Il Roma nuova? Doubt it.

With all the liberal scare tactics about all sorts of issues domestic and foreign—including, but not limited to: allowing 45 million Uh’murricans to die in the streets due to their lack of health care; kicking old people out of their nursing homes because their SS checks aren’t gooing to make the pay; or perhaps forcing millions of old people to keep on working until the age of seventy-five while secretly their retirement money is being used to pay for Sevruga caviar and creme fraiche on white toast points served to some corporate mogul’s dinner; reinstituting a draft to fill the “non-existent” needs of a military whose maximum numbers are being progressively clipped by Congress—it is only quite fair and balanced to expect at least something from Republicans when it comes to scaring folks.

If there’s one tactic that will strike fear into the hearts of every Christian voter, enough to scare them into going to the polls on November 2nd, why, accusing Libs of banning the Bible would be the most bombastic accusation Repubs can throw. Heck, it beats accusing them of hating America and undermining our security; Why stop at the corporeal realm, when you can accuse your opponents of being spawns of Satan? (Wait, didn’t Ann Coulter do that?)

But hey, at least the RNC knows how to apologize for truly inappropriate and invalid scare tactics that don’t belong in this campaign. Now if only the WorldNet Daily folks can learn to breath easy; no one will be throwing Christians to the lions any time soon.

Eh?

John Derbyshire’s known obsession over buggery and most things gay pales in comparison to that of Clayton Cramer’s, who by the way does not even obsess over buttsex:

What I find gross–and I suspect that I speak for a lot of Americans–isn’t oral sex, or even sodomy. What we find gross are the other behaviors that are part of homosexual culture. Now, before I start listing them, let me emphasize that not every male homosexual does all of these things. But I would suspect that the group of homosexual men who don’t engage in one of these behaviors is pretty darn small (the links are to soc.motss postings in which homosexuals discuss their activities or otherwise acknowledge the importance of the behavior to their culture): coprophilia (sexual pleasure from eating feces or being defecated on); “golden showers” (sexual pleasure from drinking urine or being urinated on); cross-dressing for sexual stimulation of yourself or others; sex so promiscuous that you don’t even see your partner’s face, much less know their name; exhibitionism (such as being naked and having sex in the middle of a public street); sadism; masochism; bondage and discipline; pedophilia; various forms of fetishism involving objects or leather; fisting. Sure, you can find straight people that do most of these things, but it doesn’t take much living in the San Francisco Bay Area to know that perhaps 5% of the straight population does any of these items–but gay men have built a whole culture around these paraphilias.

Clayton Cramer : Sodomy As “Icky”

Emphasis added, links removed. The way he talks about the culture, I can imagine the streets of San Francisco full of men in tented skirts sliding around while they piss themselves on the pavements that have been overly loaded with elbow grease.

HT: Brock Sides, who by the way has made Cramer his bitch.

Furl and furl alike: the mother of all bookmarklets

I’m quite an avid news and blog reader. While I personally prefer Sharpreader over most newsreaders I actually prefer to read my news in my browser for a number of reasons, most particularly is that Sharpreader uses a wrapped-around MSIE6 as its built-in browser, and I am really, really tired of IE.

My browsing habits may be quite familiar for some of you. I wheel-click through links on first-stop blogs (which those are, will remain secret) and skim through most of the opened tabs before moving along. However, before I discovered Furl (how, exactly, I have forgotten), I would remember something I read in passing and spend a lot of time clicking through my history trying to follow the trail to the post or news item I had in mind.

It is not a pleasant experience. But with Furl, all I had to do is add a simple bookmarklet to my links bar, click on it while another page is open, and it gets archived on my Furl space: a small portion of the five gigabytes alloted to me. Now, I no longer have to save a webpage (“complete” too, adding both an html file and a folder for each item) nor do I have to bookmark something that I might never visit yet again. All I have to do is Furl It, and all is well.

The archived copies are mine and mine alone to view. If I share my archive, all that will be shared would be links, and these links of course are not invulnerable to linkrot. It’s a copyright thing.

But given the choice of Furling something and saving it on my hard drive and using windows XP’s search functionality, along with my archive locked on to just my PC, I’d choose the former. Honestly? I haven’t Furled enough, considering how much I read. Then again, I suppose that’s a sign of the signal-to-noise ratio of my blog reading.

If you’re a blogger who reads and blogs at the speed of fright, Furl is a must have tool, and worth a try.

Dignity

Dear Friends,

For those who have had the privelege of my trust in my sharing the details of the past week, I thank you all for the support and assistance that you have given me. As far as personal crises go, the events of the past week have weighed heavily on me, and have yet again proven that, in life, shit comes in waves. While most of the details will remain between private communications, I can share as much: that sometimes, after a period of living without apparent direction, life itself tends to correct the situation.

I have consistently used the term “realigning my bearings” when speaking of the past week’s events. A better metaphor I could not find. The sheer simplicity and elegance of my epiphany was both so exhilirating and frightening that I needed to get off my ass and commit my introspections to action. Action that, definitely, made attention towards my blog less important.

Though the details of my plans regarding my career—my direction—have to remain private, I’d like to tell you all that I am well, and I am back.

If there is one matter of greatest import today, it was Iyad Allawi’s address to Congress, perhaps the most moving address of a foreign leader since this war began, trumping even that of Prime Minister Blair. Of less import, though of greater entertainment value, is John Kerry’s reaction: in an exhibit of total lack of dignity and discretion, John Kerry has continued to exhibit his lack of diplomatic skills. First his campaign insulted the Southern vote by picking on Zell Miller’s accent, and then, his own sister tried to undermine our alliance with Australia, and now, he called Iyad Allawi a liar. Straight from the horse’s mouth, and not only does the top-level Democrat in American politics for the moment not even show a head of state the courtesy of his presence, but all he hears is incessant braying. This is, yet again, another excellent example of how the Left has descended into the depths of most profound intolerance.

It is not cognitive dissonance for the head of state of the very country we liberated, and whose progress is in the interest of both our nation and his, to state the good things that are happening on the ground. Since the media itself, including the fair and balanced Fox News, sees no commercial benefit in telling us where we’re doing good, Iyad Allawi himself has taken on the responsibility of assuading our worries, if but for a while.

There are plenty of questions about why we need to be in Iraq. Both tactical and ethical, these questions have been addressed by the war’s supporters many times. The latest, and one of the best I’ve seen in a while, is that of Gerard Van Der Leun’s. I am a tad more idealistic than he is: for me a Democratic Iraq is not just icing on the cake, it is an integral part of our mission there as a nation. In private ramblings with some news junkie friends, we have concluded that a Democratic Iraq will be, at least in terms of geopolitics, a new Israel: a free country surrounded by those that continue to live in a despotic past. As romanticized as it may seem, a free and secular Iraq serves not just, as pessimists would write, to constantly attract the enemy towards where they can be taken out, but also as an example, one that over time the rest of the Muslim world will learn to adopt, or completely destroy (at which point we pull out all the stops).

However we may argue on the merits, or lack thereof, of the current workings of the Iraq campaign, what we must keep in mind is that it is an issue that is worthy of dignity. The Kerry campaign has consistently exhibited its lack of respect and its total disdain towards all who support this war, not just with the ambiguity with which the Democrat candidate argues his points, but with the condescension that we have come to expect, and loathe, of him. This is perhaps, the only aspect where he is in fact, consistent. I think the level of rhetoric from the Democrat candidate can be better. Then again, at this point, all he can be is better.

Archives

Monthly

Categories