<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS positioning, revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Jayvie Canono: on WordPress, Politics, Design and Life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: OF Jay</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>OF Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>And long live Hammy! Thanks for dropping by dewd. I&#039;ll be looking out for the new I&#039;ve Had Better; hope it comes out soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And long live Hammy! Thanks for dropping by dewd. I&#8217;ll be looking out for the new I&#8217;ve Had Better; hope it comes out soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hammy</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-2579</link>
		<dc:creator>hammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited#comment-2579</guid>
		<description>Tables are dead. Long live tables!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tables are dead. Long live tables!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OF Jay</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-2578</link>
		<dc:creator>OF Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited#comment-2578</guid>
		<description>The concentric circles are powerpoint-y? *sniffle* Actually with this layout---and I do like the layout---it leaves the banner to be easily changed on a whim should I feel like it. I wanna actually make one that&#039;s a bit snowflakey but I don&#039;t know where to start when it comes to making patterns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concentric circles are powerpoint-y? *sniffle* Actually with this layout&#8212;and I do like the layout&#8212;it leaves the banner to be easily changed on a whim should I feel like it. I wanna actually make one that&#8217;s a bit snowflakey but I don&#8217;t know where to start when it comes to making patterns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew J. Stinson</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-2577</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew J. Stinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited#comment-2577</guid>
		<description>I hate the cross-browser glitches in CSS especially when you get a site looking swanky in one browser and it goes to the dogs in the other.

This was my first time seeing your new layout, btw.  I like the typography but I&#039;m not sure about the graphics.  It feels too much like ... urk ... a PowerPoint template.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the cross-browser glitches in CSS especially when you get a site looking swanky in one browser and it goes to the dogs in the other.</p>
<p>This was my first time seeing your new layout, btw.  I like the typography but I&#8217;m not sure about the graphics.  It feels too much like &#8230; urk &#8230; a PowerPoint template.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mog</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>mog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>I routinely test on a html page, just save my index.php as html and work with that. Admittedly, the layouts I make myself aren&#039;t as elegant as the themes but they work for me. I can also mess up a theme pretty good too. I don&#039;t do the really great stuff like those that wouldn&#039;t even bother with a themes contest, the great few and we all know who they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I routinely test on a html page, just save my index.php as html and work with that. Admittedly, the layouts I make myself aren&#8217;t as elegant as the themes but they work for me. I can also mess up a theme pretty good too. I don&#8217;t do the really great stuff like those that wouldn&#8217;t even bother with a themes contest, the great few and we all know who they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OF Jay</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>OF Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 03:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>I agree that CSS on the &quot;perfect CSS renderer,&quot; which is something that doesn&#039;t exist, is a great system, but browser developers really ignored the bugs that came with techonology for a really long time. I have no beef with having a layout table (three rows and a total of four cells) do the grunt work of my layout but to be honest I don&#039;t know how to freaking start doing it. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that CSS on the &#8220;perfect CSS renderer,&#8221; which is something that doesn&#8217;t exist, is a great system, but browser developers really ignored the bugs that came with techonology for a really long time. I have no beef with having a layout table (three rows and a total of four cells) do the grunt work of my layout but to be honest I don&#8217;t know how to freaking start doing it. <img src='http://onefinejay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rammer</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-2574</link>
		<dc:creator>rammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 03:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2005/07/31/css-positioning-revisited#comment-2574</guid>
		<description>having spent hours this weekend trying to understand why margin-left: 35px; became margin: 35px; for IE.  and why does width: 80%; work in IE but is ignored in firefox.  how can anyone understand a system that is so fraught with variance?  at least when i hand coded everything, i knew how my tables would render.  CSS is a mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>having spent hours this weekend trying to understand why margin-left: 35px; became margin: 35px; for IE.  and why does width: 80%; work in IE but is ignored in firefox.  how can anyone understand a system that is so fraught with variance?  at least when i hand coded everything, i knew how my tables would render.  CSS is a mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
