<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help! Firefox doesn&#8217;t like my HTML, somehow&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders</link>
	<description>Aesthetics, Photography, Culture and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Golden Gate &#187; Department of Homeland Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders/comment-page-1#comment-4183</link>
		<dc:creator>The Golden Gate &#187; Department of Homeland Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 02:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders#comment-4183</guid>
		<description>[...] The Department of Homeland Stupidity is a site I just discovered a couple of days ago. Most of it good, some of it a little off&#8211;like their running debunked stories being recycled by Rolling Stone. Anyway, more interestingly, by coincidence I ran accross a web developers blog who mentioned the Tempus Fugit Blog who has a post [now we are getting to it] about his first post to The Dept. of Homeland Stupidity. And in his excerpt of his own post, he is spot on: On paper, Republicans are easily more favorable than Democrats to a libertarian-minded person such as myself. On paper, they support lower taxes, less socialism, limited government, a rigid interpretation of the Constitution, property rights, parental rights and gun rights. In practice, they do little to permanently relieve the tax burden, they support wealth redistribution in a variety of forms, theyâ€™ve bloated the government to an unprecedented degree, theyâ€™ve made a mockery of Amendments One, Four, Six, Eight and Ten, theyâ€™ve been slow and inadequate in their response to the Supreme Courtâ€™s eminent domain decision. That leaves parental rights and gun rights. So if all you want to do is to teach your kid that God created the world in seven 24-hour periods or shoot empty beer cans for fun, the Republican Party has your back. Otherwise, itâ€™s time to wake up and realize youâ€™ve been duped.    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Department of Homeland Stupidity is a site I just discovered a couple of days ago. Most of it good, some of it a little off&#8211;like their running debunked stories being recycled by Rolling Stone. Anyway, more interestingly, by coincidence I ran accross a web developers blog who mentioned the Tempus Fugit Blog who has a post [now we are getting to it] about his first post to The Dept. of Homeland Stupidity. And in his excerpt of his own post, he is spot on: On paper, Republicans are easily more favorable than Democrats to a libertarian-minded person such as myself. On paper, they support lower taxes, less socialism, limited government, a rigid interpretation of the Constitution, property rights, parental rights and gun rights. In practice, they do little to permanently relieve the tax burden, they support wealth redistribution in a variety of forms, theyâ€™ve bloated the government to an unprecedented degree, theyâ€™ve made a mockery of Amendments One, Four, Six, Eight and Ten, theyâ€™ve been slow and inadequate in their response to the Supreme Courtâ€™s eminent domain decision. That leaves parental rights and gun rights. So if all you want to do is to teach your kid that God created the world in seven 24-hour periods or shoot empty beer cans for fun, the Republican Party has your back. Otherwise, itâ€™s time to wake up and realize youâ€™ve been duped.    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OF Jay</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders/comment-page-1#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>OF Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback! I&#039;m trying to retool my CSS a little bit with the images off. The layout boxes have no color or border attribs and all the stuff we see here is one image tiled vertically. I&#039;m very picky over detail like that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback! I&#8217;m trying to retool my CSS a little bit with the images off. The layout boxes have no color or border attribs and all the stuff we see here is one image tiled vertically. I&#8217;m very picky over detail like that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy K</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders/comment-page-1#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders#comment-2995</guid>
		<description>Looks pretty much the same in my Opera with images turned off, too.
(Don&#039;t ask me what it looks like in MSIE - I avoid MSIE.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks pretty much the same in my Opera with images turned off, too.<br />
(Don&#8217;t ask me what it looks like in MSIE &#8211; I avoid MSIE.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy K</title>
		<link>http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders/comment-page-1#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinejay.com/2006/03/10/firefox-image-placeholders#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>Looks fine on my firefox with the images off - except that the alt text on your random image overruns your top menu a bit. Doesn&#039;t look the same but looks fine. I&#039;m really unfond of big blank boxes where images should be anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks fine on my firefox with the images off &#8211; except that the alt text on your random image overruns your top menu a bit. Doesn&#8217;t look the same but looks fine. I&#8217;m really unfond of big blank boxes where images should be anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
