Jayvie is many things:

I'm a Maryland resident. A self-avowed WordPress Whisperer, I use it in all my projects. I take lovely photos, go to the gym a lot, and opine strongly over design, aesthetics, and politics. I'm a heavy Twitter user, a moderate Flickr participant and in my spare time I help people at the SemperFi WP Support forums. Read more about me.

This is a random image.

“Oh my Nature Goddess! Don’t you know he’s A Gay?!”

It’s never too late for me to chime in on days-old news, this being about Cpl Matt Sanchez, recipient of the Jeane Kirkpatrick Academic Freedom Award at this year’s CPAC .

I am sick and tired of “The Left” consistently reminding Conservatives, Republicans, or whomever you want to call them, that so-and-so person is [dun, dun, dun] A Gay.

Was that supposed to make us cringe in self-disgust that (a) we didn’t know this person was A Gay or (b) we support this person because of something else not related to him being A Gay and that you people on the Left want to remind us that this person is A Gay on the off chance that we are as big bigots as you and just drop this person like a hot potato?

John Hawkins has an interesting take on the man:

First of all, there is “nothing inherently wrong with Sanchez being a gay porn star or a male escort?” Wrong answer. Yes, there is something wrong with it and if he were still doing those things, I wouldn’t want him given an award at CPAC or for that matter, even attending CPAC.

But, whether you’re talking about Sanchez or Jeff Gannon, if they want to go in a different direction with their life, I think that’s a good thing. There are plenty of Republicans, gay and straight, who have done dumb things in their past. That doesn’t mean they’re forever branded with some sort of scarlet “A,” or in Sanchez’s case, a Scarlet “GP,” for gay porn.

Take note that John didn’t mention that Cpl Sanchez was A Gay, only that he did gay porn, which from even a moral conservative’s POV is deplorable not because it is gay porn but because it is porn which is something that goes against John’s values. (Trust me, I’m a long-time reader.) And don’t even begin with his escort work either. However, let me react to John’s lede from the same article: “One of the most fascinating things about the left is that they often accuse conservatives of hating gays in one breath and then display rampant homophobia in the next.” I suppose you can call it homophobia. My guess is that it’s not so much homophobia as it is this sanctimonious self-image combined with a long-time perception that Right-Wing folks are total bigots, finally served in a package that totally underlines their lack of sense of irony. The short of it? I guess it’s homophobia.

Oh and did you know that Mary Cheney is a HUGE lesbian and that that fact was totally made clear to me during the presidential debates around 2004? I thought for a second that John Edwards wanted me to drop Cheney and co. all together because of that…

A pox on you all. Being A Gay* is none of your frickin’ business.

* — The turn of phrase “A Gay” I hear is apparently relatively common on the West Coast. I haven’t heard it used that way where I am in Maryland, and at this point I am still ambivalent about using it, really. I figured I’d use it for this post to see how it feels. My internal jury is still out on that.

300

I saw 300 today. Action, muscles, death. And not as much gore as one might think. Sure, the flying limbs and the thousands upon thousands of punctures through the movie were stark, but not as stark as, say, Kill Bill. It’s a war flick, and for a war flick, there was nothing gratuitous at all about the way it was presented.

Having said that, more than a few people have taken issue with the review from Slate, and with good reason. I’ve stopped political blogging for the most part because when that is all that surrounds us, that is all that colors the way we see things. Everything gets politicized and that just gets way boring, way too quickly. The review from the New York Times follows the same tack: “(It may be worth pointing out that unlike their mostly black and brown foes, the Spartans and their fellow Greeks are white.)” And while Matt takes on Slate’s review in his post, I will have to parrot David J’s short but direct opinion: “Sometimes a Movie About Guys Wearing Skirts is Just a Movie About Guys Wearing Skirts. Or Something to That Effect.” I think he means leather briefs and red capes, but we get the point.

It’s a highly political time and I just want to see the movie. The words sting because they work both ways. If you’re a more subtle lefty than that Dana guy from Slate you can just sit back and believe that the words are mean tongue-in-cheek. The very people you dislike tend to say the same things that Leonidas and his small army say. And if you’re the other type then you wouldn’t see any of that.

Considering the mental landscape today, if tomorrow I decided to remake a movie such as Zulu, would I, be equally guilty of baiting race? I mean, heck, savage black people from Africa were the villains here.

If there is even one criticism of the film on its merits that is worth reading, it would be this one from the NY Sun. But ultimately I don’t think it was supposed to be some “historical flick” anyway. It’s just a movie, and a good one at that.

Oh where the hell does one year go?

I’m one day from my anniversary of standing in line at the MVA to get my got-damn learner’s permit and I have been so swamped with work and life in general that I haven’t even gotten around to going to driver’s ed.

So here I am, on my day off, prepping to retake the test so that I can extend my permit for yet another year. It also looks like this time around I would finally be able to get around to going to driving school and just get this crap over and done with.

Archives

Monthly

Categories